On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 01:03 +0100, Carl Fürstenberg wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 00:12, Stephen Gran <sg...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > (I don't know why we're having this discussion on -devel, but) > > > > 2009-12-07 21:27:19 1NHl6v-0006Ak-OI SA: Action: flagged as Spam but > > accepted: score=9.2 required=5.0 (scanned in 5/5 secs | Message-Id: > > 5201899751.20091208002...@l3377l.com). From <fanf...@l3377l.com> > > (host=orsondv.mdp2.net [89.111.164.221]) for > > debian-eeepc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > > > > I know it seems an awful lot like trying to help yourself instead of > > just complaining until someone fixes it for you, but you can look at > > the world readable exim configuration and the sa-exim configuration file > > to figure out the threshholds that are set for the whole of alioth, and > > you can ask the list admin to filter on the spam score. > > > > But, of course, whatever works for you. > > -- > > I would like to point out some things here: > 1. The original poster might not be an DD, and thus doesn't have shell > access to the servers in question (please correct me if I'm wrong > here)
You're wrong, this is Alioth.
> 2. The normal interpretation of "required" gives an impression that
> the spam filter isn't activated in this particular mail, so it's
> understandable for me to think so
> 3. I feel your attitude isn't well suited for an Debian developer. Try
> be more helpful instead of sounding like a dick.
If this was the first bug report from jidanni, sure, but jidanni is a
regular bug reporter and really ought to have learned better by now.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Hoare's Law of Large Problems:
Inside every large problem is a small problem struggling to get out.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
