This one time, at band camp, jida...@jidanni.org said: > >> SpamAssassin is run on Alioth, but its results are ignored. > >> The spam, though detected, is not separated out from the stream. > > SG> This is isn't actually true > > $ GET http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.eeepc/2539/raw |grep > X-Spam-Status > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=9.2 required=5.0
(I don't know why we're having this discussion on -devel, but) 2009-12-07 21:27:19 1NHl6v-0006Ak-OI SA: Action: flagged as Spam but accepted: score=9.2 required=5.0 (scanned in 5/5 secs | Message-Id: 5201899751.20091208002...@l3377l.com). From <fanf...@l3377l.com> (host=orsondv.mdp2.net [89.111.164.221]) for debian-eeepc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org I know it seems an awful lot like trying to help yourself instead of just complaining until someone fixes it for you, but you can look at the world readable exim configuration and the sa-exim configuration file to figure out the threshholds that are set for the whole of alioth, and you can ask the list admin to filter on the spam score. But, of course, whatever works for you. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sg...@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
