On 2009-11-11, Stefano Zacchiroli <z...@debian.org> wrote: > Personally, I think that the extreme trade-off of making source upload > the default (which seems to be what you are arguing for) would be too > risky in term of degraded package quality. Look for the "FTBFS" string > in the current RC bug list, do you think the number of occurrences we > have now would decrease implementing such a proposal?
I wonder if most of those are either a) not present at source package upload time because the libraries changed later on and b) they are arch-specific, i.e. how much of those FTBFS are left if you remove those and of the "maintainer failed in a very bad way and it compiled on no architecture available to Debian" kind. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
