Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:42, Michal Čihař <ni...@debian.org> wrote: >> Hi >> >> Dne Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:39:38 +0100 >> Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> napsal(a): >> >>> As a personal note, as one of those unlucky people with a very slow >>> network connection: if binary packages built by maintainer have to be >>> discarded, than *please* allow a way to actually not upload them. >>> >>> I'm in favor of let the buildds generate binaries for all the arch >>> (even the one the maintainer used to build the package locally), but >>> having to wait a long time to upload a set of .debs and then see them >>> discarded it quite uncomfortable, and a waste of time, disk space and >>> bandwidth. >> On the other side it prevents uploading unbuildable packages. > > Absolutely. But, if we're going to this direction, then let > dput/dupload simply "ignore" .deb in the .changes, and the archive > queue processes still accepts these "partial" uploads (still checking > the .deb are in the .changes, of course), we'd have the best of both > worlds. Or am I missing something?
Yes, you're missing at least the lintian checks that happen on ftp-master. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
