On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:07:13AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Steve Langasek wrote: > > How much support must be shown for such an implementation to see it > > done?
> No additional me too messages are needed; I just wanted to wait to see > if there was some compelling objections before changing the default. > Since there haven't been any, I'll be implementing the fast version > (n...@bdo and nnn-submit...@bdo always Cc: the submitter) and once I > get a chance to delve into EoC (or whatever I end up using) fix it > properly. But I think making further changes to let submitters opt out via EoC is *not* fixing it properly, and want to dissuade you from doing that :-) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
