On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Given the high rate of people (at least in those that replied here) > in favor of adding submitter in the loop of n...@b.d.o, I think your > plan is very good: > > - include the submitter in n...@b.d.o by default now;
Considering the fact that this thread has only been here for a few hours,[1] I'm going to hold off at least for a few days to entertain objections. But hearing none, I'll implement this when I get a chance. Don Armstrong 1: Not to mention the multiple messages erroneously describing my position on the matter without allowing time for a response, or bothering to read the logs of the relevant bugs. -- There is no more concentrated form of evil than apathy. http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
