Le Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:14:16AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > > * Charles Plessy wanted to specify more precisely the format instead > of saying "RFC-2822 compliant fields". The discussion went nowhere > and nobody else expressed support for such a change.
Hi Raphaël, my main concern is the discrepancy betwen the fact that the format does not comply with RFC-2822, and the following sentence: “The meta-information would be stored in a set of RFC-2822 compliant fields”. It is you decision if the DEP needs to contain or not a precise description of the format, but I would really recommend to soften the above sentence to make it match the facts. How about: The meta-information would be stored in a set of fields similar to the ones used in RFC-2822. I think that it is important for the newcommers that our documentation is accurate and does not rely on obviousness that only comes with experience. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
