On 15/07/09 at 23:56 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Fri, 03 Jul 2009, Jon Dowland wrote: > > One thing I would like to see patch metadata help > > facilitate is patch review. At the moment the "Reviewed-by" > > header proposed would allow a tool to ensure at least two > > sets of eyeballs had seen a patch; however, patches can go > > stale. I think some chronological information is needed > > alongside the review. I propose a "Last-Reviewed" header to > > capture this information. > > Only Sean Penny acked this suggestion. What do other people think of it?
I think that this information should be stored outside of the patch (in the history of a VCS, for example). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
