Jon Dowland <jon+debian-de...@alcopop.org> writes: > One thing I would like to see patch metadata help facilitate is patch > review. At the moment the "Reviewed-by" header proposed would allow a > tool to ensure at least two sets of eyeballs had seen a patch; > however, patches can go stale. I think some chronological information > is needed alongside the review. I propose a "Last-Reviewed" header to > capture this information.
(Psst: the patch has exactly one header, structured into multiple fields. Just like an RFC2822 email message or an HTTP response.) -- \ “I bought some powdered water, but I don't know what to add.” | `\ —Steven Wright | _o__) | Ben Finney
pgpN2caXn95r3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
