[Noah Slater] > Mandating something which relies on the wholesale upgrade of hundreds > of MUAs to get right by default doesn't sound like a good solution to > me. I don't care how many RFCs you wave in my face. :)
Let's see ... another series of MUA-related standards documents, RFC 2045 and following (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions), was published in November 1996, close to 2 years before the one we're talking about. Maybe it's just me, but it seems like 2 years ago, a MUA that didn't support MIME would have been laughed out of town. Does that mean it's finally time to expect support for RFC 2369? -- Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
