On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le lundi 27 avril 2009 à 14:44 +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit : > > If you're annoyed by cc:s (well, Holger, I know you are, you told me about > > that > > more than once :-) ), configure your mailclient to set Mail-Followup-To and > > hope > > for the next poster's mailclient to support that header. Which actually > > means > > that, to a certain degree, those annoyed by cc:s could themselves do > > something > > about it.
> Mail-Followup-To is: > A. Useless junk without clear semantics > B. Violating standards > C. Only supported by a handful of clients > D. Obi-wan Kenobi says: “All of the above” http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98dec/I-D/draft-ietf-drums-mail-followup-to-00.txt Perfectly well defined. People who object to Mail-Followup-To even though it precisely addresses this problem and would be perfectly suitable as a basis for standardization are: a) wankers b) obstructionists c) on Dick Cheney's payroll d) profit -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
