On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Noah Slater wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:27:03AM +0000, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2009-04-26, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 06:03:07PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
FIRST: GO AWAY WITH YOUR STUPID CC'S. I OBVIOUSLY READ THE LIST.
Dude, chill out.
Interestingly you did it again, ignoring the list Code of Conduct.
It seems we have different ideas about what makes something interesting.
I hope we all agree that bluring a thread by discussing a Code of
Conduct which is unfortunately ignored by people from time to time
is not interesting at all and I hope you can continue discussing this
on curiosa if you are not able to provide real context to the topic.
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Charles Plessy wrote:
I have re-uploaded to non-free because I am sick of wasting my time with this
kind of issue. But since in the rejected package I had taken great care to
include uuencoded sources of the PDF and explained this in REAME.source, can
you confirm this was not acceptable for Debian and that shipping sources in the
Debian diff is not enough?
If you ask me things are quite clear: From a Debian point of view the
source includes *.orig.tar.gz, *.dsc and *.diff. The files are connected
via md5sum in *.dsc. So shipping the source of a PDF in the diff should
be acceptable from a Debian point of view (even if it would be nice to
have it i nthe upstream source). It makes sense to document this in
README.Source (as you did) AND debian/copyright (I don't know whether you
did).
I see no real reason for rejecting in your case.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
