On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 05:45:11PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > I guess people think the new copyright proposal mandates mentioning the > copyright holders etc. in a much more verbose way than Policy does so > far. > > So people consider it a regression with respect to their routine.
Great, so it seems we have made progress! If the consensus is that broad-brush copyright information is suitable for Debian, we should make it clear in the copyright proposal that people are free to make that judgement call. I apologise if I came across as too aggressive, I was only disheartened by what seemed to be a conflation of separate issues. I see the copyright proposal as a format, not policy, document. If people want to formalise the granularity of our copyright information, then so be it, but let's do that as a separate effort. Best, -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
