Russell Coker <russ...@coker.com.au> writes: > If libschilly met the criteria for being a System Library then it > probably have been packaged for use by other programs. If you want to > make a case for including libschilly as a System Library then please > provide a list of some of the other programs which depend on it.
It's also worth bearing in mind that, in the past, Debian has decided to not assume *any* library shipped with Debian is a System Library since the concept isn't particularly meaningful for a distribution maker that doesn't divide its software into the system and add-ons. It's a somewhat ill-defined and murky area of the GPL and I think Debian is best served by steering entirely clear of it with the exception of not worrying about the fact that the kernel is under the GPL. If Debian can't consider OpenSSL to be a System Library, and that was the decision that we were advised to make in the past, I can't imagine any circumstances that would allow libschilly to qualify. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
