Sam Hartman <hartm...@debian.org> wrote: Hi,
> That is, if I made the dependency in libkrb5-3.symbols look like > libkrb5-3|libkrb53 (and similar changes for other symbols files), then > both the packages in unstable and testing would satisfy the > dependencies. It seems like this would significantly reduce the > impact of the transition. Am I missing something or would this change > be a good idea? Have you considered uploading a version of krb5 with: - libkrb5-3 - libkrb4-? - libkrb53 a metapackage depending on both of the above - libkrb5-dev depending on libkrb5-3 alone and containing only the files needed to link with libkrb5-3 Then you can do a smooth transition that won't break anything. Wait until that version makes it to testing and then ask for binNMUs for anything that can be binNMUed and still depends on libkrb53. Once you're all done, get rid of libkrb4-? and libkrb53 (add a conflict on libkrb53 in libkrb5-3 to force the removal?). That should ease things quite a bit, especially given the number of rdeps... JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <jbla...@debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
