Le mercredi 04 février 2009 à 00:38 +0100, Harald Braumann a écrit : > So, what's the problem with /dev/cgroups then? If shm/ and pts/ > are allowed under /dev, wouldn't it be discriminating against > cgroups/, to not allow it there?
/dev/pts contains device entries, so it sounds right to put it in /dev. Similarly if the cgroups FS provides facilities to control some system settings, it clearly belongs in /sys. (/dev/shm is another story, and if you asked me, I’d have put it in /lib/shm instead, but it’s a bit late to change it.) -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
