On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:14:03 -0800 Paul Menage <men...@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:51 AM, sean finney <sean...@seanius.net> > wrote: > > or /proc/bus/usb or /dev/shm or /dev/pts... :) > > > > /dev is a bit different though - even if it's mounted as a udev fs, > you can create a new directory in there to act as a mount point. So, what's the problem with /dev/cgroups then? If shm/ and pts/ are allowed under /dev, wouldn't it be discriminating against cgroups/, to not allow it there? Cheers, harry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
