On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:28:12PM +0100, Jan Niehusmann wrote: > I don't like the current vote either and wouldn't mind if it was > canceled. > > My suggestion is to do a very simple vote first, with only two choices: > > a) continue with the release process and don't wait for further GRs > > Of course this means, effectively, that we do trust the release > team and other developers involved in the release process > > b) wait with the lenny release until we made decisions on the open > issues > > This means that we don't want do be hasty, take our time to > agree what the open issues are, how they could be resolved and > what further GRs are necessary to finally decide on these > matters. > > The third option, further discussion, could be included on the ballot > for completeness, but as it is roughly equivalent to "I don't want to > delay lenny but I don't want to release it in it's current state > either", it's only for people who really can't decide what they want :-) > > IMHO we have to bite the bullet: Either we release lenny without > agreeing on the DFSG issues first, or we delay lenny. > > As the vote suggested above is only sensible if lenny isn't delayed by > the vote itself, it would be good to start it ASAP and do it with a > shortened voting period.
I support this suggestion and would like to see the current vote abandoned. Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
