Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 03:02:17AM +0000, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
>> And FWIW I still believe this vote is an horrible mix-up of really >> different things, is completely confusing, and I've no clue how to vote. >> I would be surprised other people don't think the same. >> >> E.g. How can I decide 2 _and_ 4 ? Does the rule change ? Does any >> resolution that wins overs Further Discussion will be validated ? >> Because unless I'm mistaken, 2 doesn't imply 4, so if 2 wins, 4 is >> invalidated. > > No one seems to have seen it desirable to put a 2 & 4 option on > the ballotl; despite the months we took to discuss this. The web page > with the options was also up for several weeks, and a draft ballot went > up earlier. It's you who decided to put all the proposals on the same ballot. I don't think it's fair to request from people who disagree with that to invest time in proposing more options. It's you who decided to make it a mess, you could as an experienced vote taker have suggested quite some different things which could have made it cleaner instead IMHO. > Seems liek there was plenty of time to change things, and add > some of the power set options on to the ballot. If I had added options > willy-nilly, you would have screamed again of abuse of power. Sure, though you could have followed the procedure or hinted people in an even saner direction IMHO. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
