* Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) [081214 20:42]: > Pierre Habouzit <madco...@debian.org> writes: > > > This vote is nonsensical, and I'm hereby calling people to rank FD first > > or to boycott it. This is a practical joke. > > Please vote FD instead of boycotting it unless you actually want every jot > and tittle of Debian to have source and have all DFSG issues resolved > before we release lenny. That's what the original proposal is attempting > to accomplish, and since the secretary's rulings support their position, > it only needs a simple majority. All options that lead to a release of > lenny without resolving all issues first (other than FD) require a 3:1 > majority. > > FD will be a mess, but as I've previously posted, I believe that means > that we fail to override a delegate decision and hence the release of > lenny proceeds.
Though I agree with that, voting for option 4 is even more explicit (and nobody can disagree what *that* one means), so voting for option 4 as preferred option, and further discussion below (and option 1 as least desirable) is a more certain way to achive that. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org