Bastian Venthur wrote: > Russell Coker schrieb: > [...] >> While changes to the processes for uploading new packages are probably >> not desirable when a freeze is starting, it seems that Lenny might be >> delayed for >> a while. So if the GR on the Lenny release ends up actually changing >> anything then I suggest that we make some changes to prevent stalling all >> development. > > I support that request. Not only is unstable quite outdated already > (bleeding edge?) it also becomes more and more a problem since the > kernel and Xorg aren't updated anymore in unstable. That means that > newer hardware (especially Laptops) don't fully work anymore (WLAN, > Graphic, Sound). > > Since we're making it very hard for our users to get their new hardware > working seamlessly, unstable becomes more and more unattractive compared > to other distributions. > > Some suggest to cherry pick packages from experimental, but first some > packages like the kernel aren't even available there and second, since > experimental is not part of the unstable > testing > stable flow, it has > the aura of sandbox/playground/if-your-box-breaks-its-your-own-fault. > And officially we don't even recommend using unstable, aren't we? So for > me that argument is invalid. > > What I'd like to see is a solution where unstable is *never* frozen, > maybe by replacing the current frozen unstable with something temporary > and putting it between unstable and testing, where all the fixes go > while all the new stuff can still go into unstable but cannot enter the > next step while we're in the freeze: > > Normal: > > experimental || unstable > testing > stable > > Freeze: > > experimental || unstable || $something frozen > testing > stable > > Basicly we already have this with: > > experimental || unstable > testing > stable
Something like experimental || unstable-be || unstable-pt > testing >> stable with: experimental Real sandbox/playground/if-your-box-breaks-its-your-own-fault unstable-be Bleeding-Edge Constantly updated to "newest upstream" unstable-pt Pre-Testing Last "considered long-time and stable" upstream Bug-fixing, actual "unstable" testing as actually Future Stable ? -- Swisslinux.org − Le carrefour GNU/Linux en Suisse − http://www.swisslinux.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org