Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Could you please elaborate here? The DFSG does not require us to have or > ship source code for non-program works, and if documentation is being > rejected on the basis of a *source* requirement (as distinct from a > licensing issue), then I think we have a problem.
Well, we ftpmasters and assistants routinely REJECT packages containing binary components without source, eg. PDF documentation. We base this policy on the DFSG as explained in http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001 which very clearly states that documentation needs to comply with the DFSG. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
