Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote: > >> Bastian Blank wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 06:12:03PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: >>>> Le lundi 15 septembre 2008 à 10:12 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : >>>> > > Agreed. Either SELinux is suitable with our default setup and we >>>> > > should enable it by default to get all its alleged benefits, or it >>>> > > is not, and we should simply not install it. >>>> > Since the new default policy seems to be working in targeted >>>> > mode, I think we are doing fine. >>>> Fine. Then let’s enable it by default. >>> >>> Oh yeah. Do you intend to do the support? >> >> If it is not very functional by default, or it is but nobody is >> willing to support it, then it shouldn't be standard; that's the main >> point. > > If it is not functional, there should be bugs filed, no?
There should and will, but only if it used. I haven't had neither time nor interest to read the docs to correctly setup SELinux. So, the several packages which are installed by default, because of priority: standard, are completely useless. > > manoj Cheers, Raphael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
