Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Debian's Social Contract says that "Our priorities are our users and free > software". It does _not_ say that "Debian should tell users what is good". > Right? > Taken to the extreme, this would mean Debian would still require <insert obsolete kernel version here> because some users still need it for obscure reasons.
There comes a point when we can no longer support out-dated stuff any more, regardless of what the SC says. At best it takes time and effort on maintaining compatibility that could be better spent elsewhere. Should the priorities be for the users who want the old stuff or the users who want the new stuff? Brian May -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
