In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > delayed from when? I think it is better to extend the message and be > more verbose. I also think that some indication of *why* things were > delayed would solve the problem.
I must admit i dont know how those triggers work, but I asume it is "Remebering to process xxx once at end of installation"? (In that way defering is better than postponing) However the question is, if the message is only telling us, that it is not doing anything, why not just skipping it? Gruss Bernd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
