On Sat, June 28, 2008 15:12, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Franklin PIAT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >> That's true, IMHO. The funny (and *angering*) thing is, those users who >> actually notice triggers are likely to complain : >> >> "Why the Hell do you run those triggers, it wastes my time !" > > Are you basing this assumption on somethign really experienced?
I'll answer your third point first : Yes, I wish we avoid potential triggers abuses, even if it's for good will . I'm not just afraid of what people complains about. I am also afraid of those hundreds of little things that can potentially get people pissed off. > Indeed, when I run an "apt<whatever> dist-upgrade", I just launch the > command, look at the list of actions that are planned, hit "Y" to > confirm and just switch to another window and come back some hours > later. When I run "apt-get install foo", I want it to be damed fast, since I need to continue my work. [..] > I understand the point in your suggestion and we certainly should be > careful about potential triggers abuse (just like debconf abuse I'm > hunting here and there) but I don't really think that the complaints > will come from our users. Franklin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]