On Mon, 19 May 2008 17:29:13 +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 09:58:55AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 May 2008 10:42:54 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> Hmm. You say things like this:
>> > Because the git format is imho conceptualy broken and the
>> > implementation is far from completely thought out.
>>
>> And then you go saying things like that:
>> > It is trivial to generate a quilt format package from
>> > git/arch/hg/svn and I'm sure there will be a RCS-build-package soon
>> > enough that does that.
>>
>> This can not happen without manual intervention, if the topic
>> branches have overlap. And Redoing the manual conflict resolution
>> over and over and over again is a burden (the manual conflict
>> resolution lives generally in the integration branch history, and can
>> be done once, and mostly ignored from that point on).
> (...)
> git has git rerere to deal with this.
Two comments:
A) This is great for git users. Is there a hg-rerere? svn-rerere?
tla-rerere? bzr-rerere? I am just as opposed to everyone must use
git as I am to everyone must use quilt.
B) (This is an honest question). How many things can rerere remember? If
I use rerere to record how to resolve current conflicts in feature
branches, does the historical information get lost? (like, I use
rerere to help merging the current upstream version, do we lose
information about previous upstream versions?)
manoj
--
Many people feel that they deserve some kind of recognition for all the
bad things they haven't done.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
