On Sat, 17 May 2008 00:19:59 +0300, George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I personally don't think there is any need for new infrastrutures. We > only need to follow some simple rules, i.e. orig.tar.gz should be > really the original upstream source; diff.gz (debian/patches/ > included) is what the debian developer added to it. This is exactly what happened in the openssl case (modulo ./debian/patches). Indeed, this is already the recommendation: use pristine upstream, unless they have added non-dfsg materials, or something, and _all_ debian changes live in the diff.gz. Following this simple rule is what we normally do. manoj -- Leibowitz's Rule: When hammering a nail, you will never hit your finger if you hold the hammer with both hands. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]