On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 03:44:20PM +0000, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > I???d be glad if we could standardize on quilt. It is the only one to be > > both simple and powerful, and I know very few people unhappy with it. > > Other patch systems I have tried (dpatch, dbs and simple-patchsys) have > > all serious flaws that end up hitting you on non-trivial packages. > > Hello, > > would you mind telling us an example where simple-patchsys breaks? Or > is this more cdbs making things complicated for any non-vanilla use?
For example when you need different series of patches per architecture (the libc e.g. has specific hurd patches). -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgp4XJRJRhF3m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
