-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/14/08 19:20, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > (Dropping -release, which is not a discussion list, and Pierre, who is > obviously subscribed to both.) > > On 15/01/2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> This is not the right process for something like this. Instead, I >> believe you should find out specifically which packages depend on >> gnome 1.x, and offer those maintainers the option of taking over >> maintenance. > > Although getting recursive rdepends is interesting, are you suggesting > that the release team is supposed to take over the maintenance of > one-could-say obsolete software?
I think he meant that maintainers of the obsolete sw that uses v1.2 should be the ones to maintain v1.2. >> It is not a trivial task to port many programs to gnome 2; it took >> gnucash a long time. Don't screw over other maintainers; make it easy >> for them. > > xmms might be another example. *cough* - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA "I'm not a vegetarian because I love animals, I'm a vegetarian because I hate vegetables!" unknown -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHjBYiS9HxQb37XmcRAk2OAKCRxUS0jCmMBMyplYHT4iy5dJZ0dwCgsQrH hFC0Cti7tQbsuoQ/K+Bu9dY= =68wv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
