(Dropping -release, which is not a discussion list, and Pierre, who is obviously subscribed to both.)
On 15/01/2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > This is not the right process for something like this. Instead, I > believe you should find out specifically which packages depend on > gnome 1.x, and offer those maintainers the option of taking over > maintenance. Although getting recursive rdepends is interesting, are you suggesting that the release team is supposed to take over the maintenance of one-could-say obsolete software? > It is not a trivial task to port many programs to gnome 2; it took > gnucash a long time. Don't screw over other maintainers; make it easy > for them. xmms might be another example. *cough* Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois
pgpIOH5akEscD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
