[Joe Smith] > Ok. Good catch. So it seems to me that any service that is not a > shutdown prerquisite of annother service (a.k.a must be shut down > first) and which can be cleanly shutdown with [SIGTERM; pause; > SIGKILL] is a good candidate for removing the shutdown init script.
Actually, a shutdown dependency mean that a service need to shut down _after_ a service with the dependency, not before it. Also, services who need a shutdown script and that depend on scripts that do not have a shutdown script, can depend on sendsigs instead, so that is not a reason to keep a script. It is only a reason to be careful when we move to a dependency based boot sequencing. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
