On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 09:06:07PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: > [N.B. I am subscribed to -devel; please do not CC me if you are following > up there. ]
[ As you wish, but notice that I didn't have the chance of knowing that upon my first Cc. I Cc-ed you as bug submitter. Dropping the Cc now. ] > On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 07:35:12PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> There are other examples of packages in the archive which are no way >> Debian specific, but which are native as gdome2-xslt is; a fresh example >> I have in mind is ikiwiki. > > If ikiwiki FTBFS on GCC 4.3, I will probably file a bug on it, too, when I > fix the FTBFS. I don't think ikiwiki should be Debian-native either, but I > happened to file the bug on gdome2-xslt because I was working on it for > other reasons. Is this relevant to our discussion? I was not complaining about your bug report specificity on gdome2-xslt. I am just interested in a general, rather than package-specific, outcome. > It is my impression that this is the case already, but Policy is silent on > the issue; I checked before I filed the bug. Perhaps if a consensus can be > reached a guideline should be placed in Policy so that people are not > further confused. It is not so silent (see my other post), full ack on the request of a clear guideline for this in the policy. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
