On Tue, Dec 18, 2007, Bastian Venthur wrote: > 1. I *personally* hated that some packages sent a *huge* amount of
> 2. I *personally* was very annoyed by packages with very long presubj > 3. I'm definitely opposed to a feature which will pop up a *terminal* > 4. I was *personally* very annoyed by some of the reactions on this Luckily our priorities are Our Users and Free Software, not Bastian Venthur. Applying David's patch *immediately* means that maintainers get more useful bug reports that help them fix bugs, and in the end our users get a better support. I hope you realise that reportbug-ng being non-functional with a handful of packages means that users will have to use reportbug to report a bug on these packages. So they will see the ugly terminal anyway. I don't think anyone is opposed to rethink the way bug scripts are handled (even in reportbug) so that they integrate better with the reportbug-ng interface. But that should not prevent improvements from happening first. So I suggest you do that right now, or let someone else NMU reportbug-ng. > And please, don't use abusive language or even insults when contacting > me about this issue. My rng-time is currently very limited and my > motivation to work especially on this issue is already very low. We're > speaking here about a fully optional feature. Providing the output of > some scripts or having to read a presubj is helpful, but *not* mandatory > when reporting a bug. So please, Be nice! Yes, please be nice to your fellow developers. I am sorry you got insulted, but if you only got insults and no offer to help, that may indicate something to rethink about your attitude. Best regards, -- Sam. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
