[Please preserve attribution lines on quoted material, so we can see who said what in your message.]
"Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Nov 29, 2007 9:48 AM, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > That does not seem like a very safe default behaviour. When a > > > new RC bug has been submitted, it's a rather likely situation > > > that the bug is present in unstable and wasn't present before. > > > > I don't see how you get the "and wasn't present before" part of > > that. Surely this is exactly what version tagging is for? > > Only way would be to map dates to versions. Not the "only way"; the BTS already has the ability for the user to *explicitly state* which version of the package has the bug. -- \ "Our products just aren't engineered for security." —Brian | `\ Valentine, senior vice-president of Microsoft Windows | _o__) development, 2002 | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
