"Shaun Jackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Nov 24, 2007 11:05 PM, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Because there's no version information on bug #449176, so britney > > concludes that both the old and new versions of the package are > > equally buggy. > > That does not seem like a very safe default behaviour. When a new RC > bug has been submitted, it's a rather likely situation that the bug is > present in unstable and wasn't present before.
I don't see how you get the "and wasn't present before" part of that. Surely this is exactly what version tagging is for? -- \ "I was married by a judge. I should have asked for a jury." -- | `\ Groucho Marx | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]