On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:39:59PM +0000, Michal Čihař wrote: > Hi > > Dne Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:33:12 +0200 > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a): > > > That said, I believe most of the packages I package are autoconf/cmake > > based or are small enough so that a parallel build is useless, so I > > probably wont be annoyed here. > > BTW: When mentioning CMake, are there any known problems with parallel > build with it? I just randomly tried it last week and it seemed to be > broken at least in some cases.
I reckon I don't know for sure. Like automake I believe you can write extensions that break parallel build quite easily. > This is yet another problem: you can not properly detect whether > packages works correctly with parallel build at one run. You can not > guarantee it even after many runs. You just notice it when sometimes > randomly it fails when complaining about missing files. correct. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgp0q2HvIaSuS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
