Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 04:34:36PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Ondrej Certik wrote: >> >> same here, do we really need a package for a wrapper around xsltproc, >> >> where the GPL header is larger than the script itself? >> > >> > Why not to put that script inside the xsltproc package instead of >> > creating a new one? >> >> sounds like an good idea. > > And with my libxslt maintainer hat on, I must say I'm not against it. > > So Loic, if you're okay with the idea, please reassign the bug as a > wishlist against xsltproc. It would also be helpful if you'd attach the > script and the xslt to the bug.
Thanks a lot. It turns out that getxpath is redundant with xmlstarlet and is therefore dead before being born ;-) Cheers, -- +33 1 76 60 72 81 Loic Dachary mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dachary.org/loic/gpg.txt sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latitude: 48.86962325498033 Longitude: 2.3623046278953552 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
