Ondrej Certik wrote: >> same here, do we really need a package for a wrapper around xsltproc, >> where the GPL header is larger than the script itself? > > Why not to put that script inside the xsltproc package instead of > creating a new one?
sounds like an good idea. -- Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bzed.de/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
