Alle mer 8 agosto 2007, Manoj Srivastava ha scritto: > > The goal is from my POV to produce something much more complete and > > with a different scope: while the NMG etc. are (roughly) tutorials > > targeted to people who want to make their first packages etc., the DPH > > would be a rich manual for all those who maintain packages. > > All of us who maintain packages? Now, this is interesting, > since there are several styles of package build systems out there > (cdbs, yada, debhelper,plain); and even withing these are sub-genres > (dpatch, quilt,integration/feature-branches). > > > Is the goal then to include all possible manuals for all the > styles extant? Or are you going to go for one preferred style (or a few > preferred styles) and stick to that?
Thanks for pointing at this. :) Indeed, it looks at me that one of most exciting and challenging goals would be to outline (and hence describe in a detailed manner) all of the different existing styles and compare them after several points of view, so that one can choose her/his preferred style based upon which she/he believe to better fit to her/his needs, rather than just the first they suggested her/him or that with the best documentation available or something alike. I think this would be also useful for mentoring. -- Luca Brivio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
