Luis Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Qua, 2007-06-13 às 15:00 -0700, Russ Allbery escreveu:
>> My recommendation is to always use module-assistant for all non-free >> drivers that you want to use. That way, if there is a build in >> non-free, you can be pleasantly surprised, but your normal method will >> always work. > i don't think that this is useful in a debian way. That is equal to tell > the maintainer to stop his work. I think this is a ridiculous exaggeration. module-assistant is not difficult to use. Installing the correct kernel modules for your kernel is a one-line command. > i want to tell a couple of things: > 1. My critic goes for the automatic passage of packages that make other > packages (already available in testing) uninstallable or conflictive. In > these 2 sets are packages that have reverse depends and, for example, > the kernel. > 2. You, like other, confirm this situation, but for some reason, you > just don't explicit agree with it. For non-free, this is inevitable without significant changes to the way that Debian works that I don't believe will happen. Debian has provided a different solution in the form of module-assistant that in my experience works great. I recommend that you learn how to use it rather than tilting at windmills. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
