On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 05:25:59PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > Promote 'quite probably broken in some ways' stuff isn't the motto. > Upload everything that we've in experimental actually seems to be more > appropriate.
Eh, you lost, now. Please go read what experimental is for. > >I don't think I would like that at all! An essential difference between > >unstable and experimental is that unstable has "should be working" > >packages, while experimental has "quite likely still has issues" > >packages. > >If experimental were dropped, how the hell am I supposed to distinguish > >between the two? > > That's the point, you would be using testing for development and > cherry picking changes from unstable manually. That doesn't work. Packages migrate from unstable to testing in only ten days; if people know that, nobody ever bothers to manually force package upgrades. [...] -- <Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
