* Lucas Nussbaum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070612 23:17]: > On 12/06/07 at 22:23 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > NO! > > > > unstable is meant for packages that should be in the next stable release, > > as such only packages that are in the maintainer's opinion ready to migrate > > to testing should be uploaded to unstable. > > Then shouldn't we have a more aggressive policy about removals from > unstable, for packages that have failed to get into testing during the > past n months ?
We have that policy, just nobody who does the QA-bits needed to make that happen. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
