On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:29:59AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote: > Considering that we know that experimental is not a full branch and > there's no migration from experimental to unstable, do you agree then > we could remove experimental and switch unstable automatic nature to > not automatic (release) and keep it's current features: 'full' branch, > migration from unstable to testing and others ?
Eh, I don't think I understand what you're suggesting here. Perhaps a few questions will help: * What effect do you think removing experimental will have on unstable? * How do you think it will have that effect? Personally, I think the net effect on _unstable_ achieved by removing _experimental_ will be zero. * What do you mean by "switch unstable automatic nature to not automatic" * How does that fit in with "keep it's current features: 'full' branch, migration from unstable to testing and others"? I'm afraid you've completely lost me in that bit of your suggestion. -- <Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes. -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
