[ removing -wnpp and the bug report from the CC list ] * Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070205 23:34]:
> > > Is there any particular reason for iceape-l10n-* being a better > > > name then iceape-locale-*? > > consistency. end users and dumb people like me like it when they don't > > have to learn package naming schemes again and again for every group of > > packages. > > > > <dream>maybe, we can even have a consistency within all debian packages > > for lenny (I don't care so much if it is *-i18n-* or *-l10n-*).</dream> > <dream>not only for names but for short descriptions[1], or even better, > long descriptions, too</dream> > 1. "development files for libfoo", "libfoo -- development files", > "Header files and static libraries for libfoo", "libfoo (development > headers)", "libfoo (development package)", etc. Wasn't there some time ago a project trying to improve package descriptions? Perhaps after the release would be the perfect time to revive it? Yours sincerely, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
