In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:02:41 -0800, Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>>We have a SA rule for this run now, but sending such hints to
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] will get them seen much faster than debian-devel that I'm
>>more than a week behind in reading.
>
>So you really want to be manually informed about spam runs against the
>BTS? Don't you notice unusual activity in some rrd-based monitoring
>system?
If you have an idea for a new spamassassin rule that will get a
current spam run without triggering on non-spam, send it to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unfortunatly, much spam is now using anti-bayes tecniques
and is hard to catch without also getting non-spam.
I do see each message with a SA score >= -1, but at times I've been
days behind slogging through them.
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
