David Nusinow wrote: > On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 10:37:58PM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote: >> On Sun August 27 2006 06:47, Sander Marechal wrote: >>> * Desktop - basic: Simple minimal GNOME installation pretty much as >>> it is now, maybe with even less software preinstalled. (I was >>> surprised by the ammount of software that came along with it). >>> >>> * Desktop - stand alone: End-user desktop enviroment where we can >>> safely add fancy integration tricks and extra components that Ubuntu >>> does as well. >> If by "we" you mean Debian... great success in that endeavour would >> essentially put Ubuntu out of business, I don't think that is what >> either wants. > > I don't care one way or another if it puts Ubuntu out of business (or > Canonical, as it were), but I want Debian to provide a top-notch desktop > experience for Debian's sake.
I agree. Just because Debian doesn't target the newbie's and Windows switchers that much, doesn't mean that Debian people don't want a nicely integrated desktop. A Debian desktop would be different from an Ubuntu desktop because it targets different people. -- Sander Marechal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
