* John Goerzen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 06:12:34PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > diff also doesn't preserve permissions, so some are using debian/rules > > > anyway. > > > > Indeed but that can make thing broke due the wrong permission of > > upstream files, iff you use darcs to maintain those fixes mixed with > > changes for packaging. > > It's true that it *can* happen, but it rarely *does* happen, and when it > does, there are easy workarounds. > > I do use darcs to track patches against upstream. I really don't > understand the whole cdbs/dpatch/whatever thing -- why use a hack to > manage your patches when you could use a real VC tool that does it > better?
Amen to that. (although I use svn) -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
