On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:09:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > Nobody has to learn Darcs to hack on my packages. > > Well if someone has to work on a "which of the applied patch broken > the package is such a way" kinda issue, he will have to, in order to > have access to the patches. > dpatch, quilt and others, in this case, make life easier (especially for > security support). >
Ack .... but on the other hand if the repository is public *and* people do organize their checkins in a sorted manner, than using a SCM can be fine too. Anyway, as a side note on this thread: *darcs is just far toooo slow* for decent maintenance of large pieces of software. I tried once to create a mozilla repository, do some work with it and it was completely unusable. I am not talking about minutes, but almost hours to finish tasks that should take seconds. - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack | : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org/ | `- http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
