Hi, * Ian Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060726 13:18]: > But, for example, foo <-Depends-> foo-data is not usually an example > of a silly dependency.
Actually, there is no reason why foo-data needs foo configured before being configured, but there might be reason for the other direction. Why not inventing some new "Depends-for-being-useful" from foo-data to foo, and having Depends cycle-free? Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
